This is another “learn by doing” approach. My initial reaction to the Goal Based Learning (GBL) theory is that it resembles the problem based learning theory. Both are unlike the traditional approach to instruction. Students are given open ended, real-world problems to solve. Learning teams are an integral part of this theory as well. Roles are assigned and resources are provided. In Schank’s article, he pointed out that elementary students strive to please the teacher and this age group learns because they are motivated to do so. As we evolve into adult learners, the dynamics change a bit. In GBL, goals are identified, questions are produced, and questions are addressed. As Hsu discusses further in his article, the learner is given a realistic mission and is driven by the motivational interests or powers of the cases/problems. Team work is encouraged, an end goal is in mind, and students can be flexible to select their own strategies to meet that end goal.
One barrier that comes to mind is that in order for GBL to be implemented successfully, whether teacher-led or computer-led is that the learner must be motivated to tackle the end goal. I would think that this would involve a great deal of planning to ensure that all learners were on board. If it were computer-led, there would need to be the appropriate technology infrastructure to support this. I can easily relate to that one barrier. A component of this perspective of learning is that it builds upon prior knowledge. I can see that as being a barrier for some learners.
Once again, I think GBL can be very beneficial to learners. There is nothing like the experiencing the simulations as it would present itself in the real world. As Nowakowski’s article points, out if the learners are afforded the genuine experience of applying their skills, they are more unlikely to forget what they have learned. Real world tasks essentially prepare our students to become resourceful and prepare them for the real-world in which someday they will have to function in. I can see where this theory would also build their confidence for future learning and/or endeavors.
I like what you have pointed out about infrastructure being a barrier. I think this can be a problem with a lot of the methods we have been discussing. All of them are great methods which require quite a bit of work and planning (which is up to the teacher). But the infrastructure, the computers and equipment and resources are out of our hands (and a lot of us aren't afforded those luxuries due to this economy). Perhaps this is why so many teachers rely on traditional methods? Because they are cheap haha.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the barriers that you mentioned. Planning is very important and unmotivated learners will need extra assistance in using this program. It seems as if this theory requires more time than some teachers may have. Some may want to use it but may need assistance integrating it onto their online or traditional courses.
ReplyDelete